WRITING VS REALITY
People seldom write like who they really are. Aside from exhibiting their level of education through vocabulary and structure, or revealing their political and religious beliefs, writers, bloggers, internet daters generally do not write honestly about themselves in a way that we, as readers, would be able to know them after sitting and chatting for an hour over a cup of coffee. Most people try to be honest, but social conditioning and the nature of the art of writing limits our ability to present accurate descriptions of ourselves.
I can't describe my person as well as a good friend or lover can, or even a sharp-minded adversary. And I think I'm more honest with myself than most.
When writing auto-biographically, you can't spout all your great qualities, your smarts, your ability to leap over tall buildings, because 1) you would probably not be believed and 2) in order to come across as being valid and honest, you must be able to convince readers that you have the most important quality as an observer of yourself: humility.
On the flip side, you can't drone on about your insecurities and faults because this would be read as an indication of low self-esteem and depression and does not make for interesting reading unless you are REALLY good at it, like Dostoevsky or Kafka--but it's still dreary reading. And sometimes self-flagellation is actually a cover-up for a monstrous ego.
So the beauty of an autobiographical kind of blog is that the reader can ascribe whatever characteristics she wants to the writer. Sex blogs, especially the ones without photos, are successful for exactly that reason. Because, as often quoted from Einstein, to humans "Imagination is [far more appealing and useful in all creative fields including sex and] more important than knowledge.
Mr. V., when we were writing often to each other and before we met in person, came across in the course of several messages as being a sort of sensitive manly-man hopelessly romantic and a connosieur of all things beautiful. He was these things, but not primarily, and I would say that though to him these qualities are important, they are not what his friends admire in him. I would describe him as being a Bacchus/Santa Claus (he's going to kill me if he reads this), full of wine and fun, laughing bad things off easily, omnivorous in his interests, gregarious, and unconditionally loyal and caring to those lucky enough to call him a friend. I've also seen him bull-dog his way through business deals, and know from seeing his work that dark streaks abound. None of these traits were evident in his writing. I like him much better in person.
The opposite happened with Joshua, a guy I met at a Christmas party while visiting a friend in NY. We made out, cooked kugel in his kitchen, and developed a fantastic rapport long-distance over the phone and internet. He was damn smart, read everything from Rousseau to string theory crap, belonged to some music society at Lincoln Center, and before long we were professing our love and planning on having 6 babies. Then we spent a weekend together, and found out that our love was only in writing and definitely not in reality. We could barely stand each other and hung around my apartment reading and trying to keep up some semblance of politeness before his flight home. Just awful. Torture for us both. Really too bad because besides being intellectually compatible, he had the biggest goddamn dick I've ever seen.
Inevitably I come to Freddy who I love a little too obviously for both of our tastes. Freddy is in fact a genius in several ways, but I would never have suspected it if I had known him through his writing only. His attempts at rearranging the English grammatical system (and this is much tempered in his blog) would have thrown me off entirely. I am still trying to teach him why and where to use apostrophes. This is unworthy of a person with his insatiable curiosity and ability to quickly analyze the mechanics and physics of all machinery. I slept with him shortly after he made, out of scrap metal, a piece that had broken in my ancient sewing machine. (This was during the time Iliojuet and I were involved in the ill-fated business of designing purses and hats. I'm hoping we can give it another go with a bit more planning and capital.)
Two years ago, he had never even touched a computer--he's a painter, why would he need to? I bought one at a garage sale just for writing papers, and he took it apart. Then he started building them out of rummaged parts, and then he learned programming. Now in the room that I want to clear out for Bb, there are no fewer than six computers all subject to experimentation and crashing. I tell him to stay away from this one, but occasionally on the days that I don't write, it's because he's been messing with it. Anyway, he's never not been able to fix something, and gets 90% of the credit for making our relationship work. I am good for the 10% that is sex.